S Jaishankar recalled how the then government did not respond after the 26/11

S Jaishankar’s Critique of Past Government Responses

The 26/11 Mumbai Attacks and Government Inaction

In the aftermath of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar criticized the previous government’s lack of action. He pointed out that there was no effective response from India after the attacks, which left the nation vulnerable. Jaishankar emphasized that this inaction was a significant failure in national security.

Jaishankar’s View on UPA’s ‘Diffident’ Response

Jaishankar described the UPA government’s response as “diffident”, highlighting their hesitation to take decisive action. He noted that the leadership at that time chose to debate options rather than act, which he believes was a grave mistake. This approach, according to him, sent a message of weakness to adversaries.

Comparing Past and Present Defense Strategies

Today, Jaishankar asserts that India has transformed its defense strategies under Prime Minister Modi. He stated that the current government has adopted a zero tolerance policy towards terrorism, contrasting sharply with the previous administration’s indecisiveness. This shift reflects a stronger commitment to national security and a readiness to respond to threats effectively.

Jaishankar’s reflections on the past serve as a reminder of the importance of decisive action in the face of terrorism. He believes that the lessons learned from 26/11 have shaped a more robust defense policy that prioritizes the safety of the nation.

India’s Shift in Defense Policy Under Modi

Zero Tolerance Towards Terrorism

Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India has adopted a zero tolerance policy towards terrorism. This means that the country no longer hesitates to respond to threats. The government has made it clear that it will take strong action against any terrorist activities, unlike in the past when responses were often seen as weak or indecisive.

The Role of Leadership in Defense Transformation

Leadership plays a crucial role in shaping defense policies. Modi’s government has focused on strengthening India’s defense capabilities and ensuring that the military is well-equipped to handle any challenges. This shift has been marked by a commitment to enhancing the domestic defense industry, aiming for atmanirbharta or self-reliance in defense production.

Public Perception of India’s Defense Stance

The public’s view of India’s defense stance has changed significantly. Many citizens now feel more secure knowing that the government is willing to take decisive action. This change in perception is important as it reflects a growing confidence in the country’s ability to protect itself.

The Modi government has transformed India’s defense policy, moving from a reactive approach to a proactive one, ensuring that the nation is prepared to face any threats head-on.

In summary, India’s defense policy under Modi marks a significant shift towards a more assertive and self-reliant approach, focusing on strong leadership and public confidence in national security.

The Uri and Balakot Strikes: A New Era of Retaliation

Details of the Uri Surgical Strike

In September 2016, India launched a surgical strike against terror camps in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. This was a direct response to the Uri attack, where 19 Indian soldiers lost their lives. The Indian Army Special Forces crossed the Line of Control (LoC) and targeted several terrorist launchpads, causing significant damage and casualties among the terrorists.

Impact of the Balakot Airstrike

In February 2019, following a suicide bombing in Pulwama that killed 40 CRPF soldiers, India conducted an airstrike in Balakot. This operation involved the use of advanced fighter jets and precision bombs, effectively destroying the terror infrastructure. The airstrike marked a significant shift in India’s defense policy, showcasing a zero tolerance approach towards terrorism.

The Uri and Balakot strikes represent a new chapter in India’s military strategy, emphasizing a proactive stance against threats. This change reflects a broader commitment to national security and a willingness to respond decisively to acts of terrorism.

International Reactions to India’s Military Actions

The international community had mixed reactions to India’s military actions. While some countries supported India’s right to defend itself, others expressed concern over escalating tensions in the region. The strikes were seen as a clear message that India would no longer tolerate terrorist activities without a response, marking a pivotal moment in India-Pakistan relations.

The Legacy of 26/11 and Its Impact on Indian Policy

Lessons Learned from the Mumbai Attacks

The 26/11 Mumbai attacks were a wake-up call for India, highlighting the urgent need for stronger national security measures. The attacks, which resulted in the deaths of 175 people, exposed significant gaps in India’s counterterrorism strategies. In the aftermath, the government recognized that a more proactive approach was necessary to prevent such tragedies in the future.

Changes in National Security Measures

In response to the attacks, India revamped its national security policies. The focus shifted towards a zero tolerance approach to terrorism, emphasizing the importance of swift and decisive action against threats. This change was marked by the implementation of new counterterrorism laws and the establishment of specialized units to handle terrorist activities more effectively.

The legacy of 26/11 has profoundly influenced India’s defense policies, pushing the nation towards a more assertive stance against terrorism. The Uri and Balakot strikes are prime examples of this shift, demonstrating India’s commitment to responding to threats with strength and determination.

Jaishankar’s Reflections on 26/11

S. Jaishankar has often reflected on the lessons learned from the 26/11 attacks. He criticized the previous government’s diffident response, stating that India can no longer afford to remain passive in the face of aggression. Under the current leadership, there is a clear understanding that responding to terrorism is not just a matter of policy but a necessity for national integrity and safety.

India-Pakistan Relations: A Historical Perspective

Key Events Shaping Bilateral Relations

India and Pakistan have a complicated history that dates back to their partition in 1947. This division created two nations with different identities, leading to ongoing tensions. The roots of their conflict lie in various historical and political events, including territorial disputes and differing national ideologies. India and Pakistan have a complex and largely hostile relationship that is rooted in a multitude of historical and political events, most notably the partition.

The Role of Terrorism in Diplomatic Tensions

Terrorism has played a significant role in shaping the relationship between these two countries. Incidents like the 2001 Indian Parliament attack and the 2008 Mumbai attacks have heightened hostilities. These events have led to a cycle of blame and retaliation, further straining diplomatic ties. The adversarial nature of their relationship has often overshadowed any attempts at peace.

Future Prospects for Peace and Cooperation

Despite the challenges, there are still opportunities for dialogue and cooperation. Both nations have engaged in peace talks at various times, but these efforts have often been derailed by violence and mistrust. Moving forward, it is crucial for both countries to find common ground and work towards a more stable and peaceful relationship.

The history of India-Pakistan relations is a reminder that understanding and dialogue are essential for lasting peace. Without addressing the underlying issues, the cycle of conflict is likely to continue.

In conclusion, the relationship between India and Pakistan is shaped by a complex history filled with conflict and missed opportunities for peace. Understanding this history is vital for any future efforts to improve relations between the two nations.

S Jaishankar’s Vision for India’s Global Role

Economic Growth and International Trade

S Jaishankar believes that India’s economy is growing rapidly and needs strong partnerships with other countries. He emphasizes that India has moved from being a smaller player to a significant force in the global market. This growth is not just about numbers; it reflects India’s increasing importance in international trade and diplomacy.

India’s Strategic Partnerships

Jaishankar highlights the importance of building strategic partnerships with various nations. He sees these alliances as crucial for enhancing India’s global influence. By collaborating with other countries, India can address common challenges and promote mutual interests, especially in areas like security and trade.

Challenges and Opportunities on the World Stage

While there are many opportunities for India, Jaishankar also acknowledges the challenges that come with them. He points out that India must navigate complex international relations, especially with neighboring countries like Pakistan. However, he remains optimistic about India’s ability to rise to these challenges and play a vital role on the world stage.

In today’s world, India is not just a participant but a key player in shaping global policies. The leadership of Prime Minister Modi has transformed India’s approach to international relations, making it more proactive and assertive.

Jaishankar’s vision reflects a confident India that is ready to take on new roles and responsibilities in the global arena, ensuring that its voice is heard and respected.

Public and Political Reactions to Jaishankar’s Statements

Media Coverage and Public Opinion

S Jaishankar’s remarks about India’s past responses to terrorism have sparked significant media attention. Many commentators have noted the stark contrast between the previous government’s approach and the current administration’s stance. The public reaction has been mixed, with some praising the new assertiveness while others express concern over the implications of a more aggressive defense policy.

Political Responses and Debates

Political leaders from various parties have weighed in on Jaishankar’s statements. Some have supported his critique of the UPA’s handling of the 26/11 attacks, arguing that it reflects a necessary shift in India’s defense strategy. Others, however, have accused the current government of using the issue for political gain. The debate continues to highlight the tensions surrounding national security and the effectiveness of current policies.

The discussions around Jaishankar’s comments reveal a broader sentiment in India. Many citizens feel that the country must adopt a stronger stance against terrorism, especially after the tragic events of 26/11. This sentiment is shaping public opinion and influencing political discourse as the nation seeks to redefine its security policies.

Conclusion

In summary, S. Jaishankar highlighted a significant shift in India’s approach to national security and terrorism. He pointed out that the previous government did not take action after the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai, leaving many questions unanswered. However, under the current leadership, India has adopted a strong stance against terrorism, demonstrated by the decisive actions taken in Uri and Balakot. Today, India is determined to protect its citizens and respond firmly to threats, showing that it will no longer tolerate acts of terror. This new direction reflects a confident nation that is ready to face challenges head-on.